Labour drug chief David Nutt sacked for speaking the truth (By Postman Prat, Alan Johnson, of all people)
2005 England and Wales report of drug related deaths:
Tobacco 86,500
Alcohol 6,627
Heroin 842
PARACETAMOL 446 (Any fucker who thinks this is a safe drug knows fuck all. And believe me, I speak from experience on this one)
All anti-depressants 401
Methadone 223
Cocaine (including crack) 176
Amphetamine 103
MDMA/Ecstasy 58
ASPIRIN 14
Cannabis 0
No FUCKING individual in HUMAN FUCKING HISTORY has died directly from cannabis. Why? It's NOT TOXIC ENOUGH. GET IT?
And don't give me any of this fucking crap about skunk; yes, it's STRONGER, in which case, TAKE FUCKING LESS, like you do with whiskey. Oh, wait, yes, that's right, we're unable to do that, because Cannabis growth isn't regulated, and as such, users are more prone to overdoses, down to its illegal nature. Forgot about that one.
Also, the tobacco element; simple - smoke cannabis with herbal cigarettes. Problem. Fucking. Solved. There'd be no tobacco involved, so no tar production, and all the shit that comes with tobacco intake.
People can have panic attacks from the use, which is true, and, again, with legality of cannabis, but coming with strict regulation of its usage, such problems could be far easier to monitor. Like any fucking drug in the world, there will be SOME nasty side effects for SOME people.
Ugh, I hate this debate so much, and the lies and deception spread around it. Did anyone see that odious scumbag, Jacqui Smith, the hypocrite of the year, on Question Time? Horrible TV. I was depressed at her weasel performance, and her defending her indefensible comments on her drug policy.
I make no secret of the fact that I think The War On Drugs, is the worst piece of existing policy in this country. Yes, even worse than The War On Terrorism, solely because the War On Terror also includes elements with the drug war in it.
The history of cannabis has always been a conveniently ignored one, because before the war on drugs, created by the most corrupt president in US history, to be then imported into this country, most dope-smokers weren't anti-establishment hippies, and to say so, is entirely duplicitous. The vast majority of cannabis smokers were women who used cannabis to relieve period pains. FACT. (Edit: Degaffed @_@)
Cannabis has been proven to help act as a pain reliever for various tumours, not to mention actually downsizing brain tumours, and is also an aid to bipolar disorder. Oh. Wait. Not only is cannabis a classified drug, but not even the NHS are allowed to issue cannabis as a medicine, despite NHS centres in the UK being allowed to prescribe heroin. Fuck, I hate using Littlejohnian phrases, but you actually couldn't make this shit up.
Oh, here's another fun fact about cannabis; do you know, in the country where the drug war originated, which is the United States, eight individuals there actually get cannabis provided to them by the federal government, for medical reasons?
But, as wisely pointed out by an audience member on Question Time, the only reason the politicians won't do anything with alcohol and tobacco, is because they get revenue from it.
Alan "Postman Prat" Johnson is such a fucktard. I hate his smarmy fucking face, his history (Aka, the fucker that helped introduced tuition fees), and everything about him, but beyond all others, how he's hailed as "decent" because of his "background as a postie". What shallow shit that is. Hitler was an ex-serviceman, and from humblestock, as was Thatcher; oh, yeah, they're fucking great, aren't they? Ugh. It's times like this when I think we need a new Guy Fawkes ;)
Friday 30 October 2009
Thursday 29 October 2009
Cultural Marxism
Dear BBC,
I, as a proud, self-registered member of "The Silent Majority", in this once great country, am getting increasingly alarmed by the preposterous levels of cultural and social Marxism displayed in your output. With certainty, I can tell you that I am losing a lot of sleep over it, and am becoming frightened to go out of my own home, because of it.
You, and many other PC, right-on do-gooders may get a cheap laugh out of these lefties, but not I; their antics are increasingly destroying the fabric of our society, and the BBC is busily engaged in emulating their ways, and trying to stain our culture with it.
Take Groucho, for instance, and his "witty" comebacks to his superiors, and all authority that stares him in the face; back in my day, we didn't make no cheeky retorts - we did what we were told. And that's the way it should be. Authority is unquestionable, yet Groucho, and all the other "right on" do-gooders that the BBC hire as "comedians" persist on defying this traditional, upstanding attitude. You can clearly see the effect this has on our feral youth of today, where they don't have the blindest bit of respect for authority, and, like Groucho, are making these "witty" retorts. It's just not on. A clip round the earhole would do these young shavers the world of good. Although we can't even do THAT nowadays, thanks to "yuman rights".
Chico, as well, and his Italian "gangster" accent; clearly glorifying the violent gangster culture, not to mention the rubbishing of our good, never changing English language. It's an absolute disgrace. The BBC are culprits of this as well, imbibing the attitudes of Chico. For starters, whenever there's yet another story about a feral yob vandalising property, or committing one crime or another, you won't even have the guts to call these young yobs for what they are; you'll always resort to something ridiculous, like, "restless young adult", or something else of a similar nature, radiating in sheer Political Correctness. As for the accents....don't get me started on THAT one; what on Earth, apart from even more Political Correctness, and the cultural undermining of our great English language, would be the reason for hiring people with bloody regional accents?! I'm routinely plagued with these new presenters, listening to them, and thinking to myself: Can't they pronounce ANYTHING right? This constant imbibing of Cultural Marxism is deeply disturbing, and the ordinary man on the street is becoming increasingly afraid to walk out on an evening, because of it.
Last and not least, there's Harpo; practical jokes aren't practical, or a joke. Let's be perfectly clear about that one. Slapstick has always promoted mass violence in our once great country, and is clearly a direct influence to the now named "happy slapping". (Only a Cultural Marxist would name this act "Happy", so even the name is a Cultural Marxist invention) Of course, back in my day, we didn't have no phones. We played football in the park. (Rugby, for us tougher, more macho folk) And again, the BBC wish to emulate this, by having their own slapstick comedians on, and airing shows, which use slapstick as humour. Our true, blue, British values are being eroded by the day, and the BBC is busily engaged in contributing to this erosion. Well, I, and many others are looking at this drastic downhill slope for our society, and must come to the conclusion that in 20 years, there won't be a Britain left, let alone a GREAT Britain. We urge you to ditch this Cultural Marxism immediately, before the effects of it are irreversible.
Yours faithfully,
Terry Shitehouse; a PROUD British.
I, as a proud, self-registered member of "The Silent Majority", in this once great country, am getting increasingly alarmed by the preposterous levels of cultural and social Marxism displayed in your output. With certainty, I can tell you that I am losing a lot of sleep over it, and am becoming frightened to go out of my own home, because of it.
You, and many other PC, right-on do-gooders may get a cheap laugh out of these lefties, but not I; their antics are increasingly destroying the fabric of our society, and the BBC is busily engaged in emulating their ways, and trying to stain our culture with it.Take Groucho, for instance, and his "witty" comebacks to his superiors, and all authority that stares him in the face; back in my day, we didn't make no cheeky retorts - we did what we were told. And that's the way it should be. Authority is unquestionable, yet Groucho, and all the other "right on" do-gooders that the BBC hire as "comedians" persist on defying this traditional, upstanding attitude. You can clearly see the effect this has on our feral youth of today, where they don't have the blindest bit of respect for authority, and, like Groucho, are making these "witty" retorts. It's just not on. A clip round the earhole would do these young shavers the world of good. Although we can't even do THAT nowadays, thanks to "yuman rights".
Chico, as well, and his Italian "gangster" accent; clearly glorifying the violent gangster culture, not to mention the rubbishing of our good, never changing English language. It's an absolute disgrace. The BBC are culprits of this as well, imbibing the attitudes of Chico. For starters, whenever there's yet another story about a feral yob vandalising property, or committing one crime or another, you won't even have the guts to call these young yobs for what they are; you'll always resort to something ridiculous, like, "restless young adult", or something else of a similar nature, radiating in sheer Political Correctness. As for the accents....don't get me started on THAT one; what on Earth, apart from even more Political Correctness, and the cultural undermining of our great English language, would be the reason for hiring people with bloody regional accents?! I'm routinely plagued with these new presenters, listening to them, and thinking to myself: Can't they pronounce ANYTHING right? This constant imbibing of Cultural Marxism is deeply disturbing, and the ordinary man on the street is becoming increasingly afraid to walk out on an evening, because of it.
Last and not least, there's Harpo; practical jokes aren't practical, or a joke. Let's be perfectly clear about that one. Slapstick has always promoted mass violence in our once great country, and is clearly a direct influence to the now named "happy slapping". (Only a Cultural Marxist would name this act "Happy", so even the name is a Cultural Marxist invention) Of course, back in my day, we didn't have no phones. We played football in the park. (Rugby, for us tougher, more macho folk) And again, the BBC wish to emulate this, by having their own slapstick comedians on, and airing shows, which use slapstick as humour. Our true, blue, British values are being eroded by the day, and the BBC is busily engaged in contributing to this erosion. Well, I, and many others are looking at this drastic downhill slope for our society, and must come to the conclusion that in 20 years, there won't be a Britain left, let alone a GREAT Britain. We urge you to ditch this Cultural Marxism immediately, before the effects of it are irreversible.
Yours faithfully,
Terry Shitehouse; a PROUD British.
Wednesday 28 October 2009
The War Against Terrorism And Drugs (NEW DEVELOPMENT!)
Drugs and terrorists go together like chalk and cheese....er, I mean, like bricks and cement. Well, now there's a vital development that's been unearthed in how terrorists raise money for Weapons Of Mass Destruction, that have the revolutionary ability of vanishing. Yes. Vanishing. Vanishing before UN weapons inspectors' eyes. Vanishing. And you probably are raising money for these weapons in this country, as well. How so? You all buy this consumer product, which, in actuality, is nothing short of a DANGEROUS DRUG. Yes. DANGEROUS DRUG. Created by TERRORISTS, to fund these weapons. This DANGEROUS DRUG is subtly, but in actuality, causing the breakdown of our once great country, not to mention its VITAL role in the funding of terrorists, capable of sending a shower of nuclear missiles down on your city ANY MINUTE.
So, you might ask......what is this "DANGEROUS DRUG"?
.....
.....
That's right: TEA.
Tea is an evil drug, which has an evil substance in it, called caffeine, which is a stimulant; in other words, it can send you psychotic, as the Daily Mail wisely informs you, day in, day out.
This evil drug is brewed by terrorists, as their prime funding for not only Weapons Of Mass Destruction, but Weapons Of Mass Destruction, that can vanish at the users' will. Ha! Take that, smarmy UN weapons inspectors! George Bush told you lot, motherfuckers! That's why you should listen to him, you inept bastards!
Reports (That'll look convincing enough), have shown that the chief brewers of this evil drug, who are also high in the ranks of Al Qaeda, are: P.G. al-Tipsali, Abu Typhoojir and Mohammed Tetleyqir, and are situated in Iran. IRAN!!! Yes, you fucking milk coffee drinking, sandal wearing, yoghurt knitting, left-wing hippy liberals; EYE-fucking-RAN!!!!! It all fits in! Duuuur, any simpleton could now put the pieces together. Iran. Nuclear weapons project. (That those junkie UN officials keep denying) Funding via tea. All. Makes. Sense!
Not ONLY that, but according to a study, founded in a collaboration with the News Of The World, and the Taxpayers' Alliance, tea has other social effects on our once great country, now Broken Britain. Yes. Tea is the starting drug which leads to all other drugs. People start drinking tea, only to lead on to a path of other, BIGGER drugs, like cocaine and heroin. Tea is also brewed THREE times stronger than it was before, as well, being FAR more dangerous. Oh, yes. Not a problem for good drugs, like whiskey, as we ALL (Except feral youths), know to drink less whiskey, as it's stronger. But tea, no. Oh, no no no. Different kettle of fish, I say. Tea, when brewed stronger, is just infinitely and unconditionally worse.
Tea also leads to higher divorce rates; one in three tea drinkers have been divorced. Let's look back to thirty years ago, when Britain was a bit more greater: tea was also brewed three times weaker then, as we established. Only one in 10 tea drinkers thirty years ago, had been divorced. See the pattern!? The stronger the "brew" (As those bleeding northerners say), the higher the divorce rate! You couldn't make it up!
An alleged effect, also, is that tea keeps people awake longer, as per the stimulant effect. Meaning? Meaning, more feral youths are prone to staying awake longer, roaming around the streets later.....causing more terror and vandalism on the streets of our ONCE GREAT COUNTRY!
Yes, indeed; the effects that this DANGEROUS DRUG has on society is irrefutable. But let's look at the history of tea: how did this DANGEROUS DRUG get passed into British society?...
...
...Fuckin' immigrants. That's what. That's more than enough reason to make this drug a class A drug.
But back to the terror link....
Yes, these Brewers Of Mass Destruction, threatening jihad against the West, like all Mu, er, I mean, extremists, are brewing this DANGEROUS DRUG in Iran, before our very eyes. And Ahmadinejad is naturally in cahoots. (What the fuck did you expect!?)
The way, the only way, to rid ourselves of this DANGEROUS DRUG, and these Brewers Of Mass Destruction, is to invade Iran. Yes. Invade Iran. Hunt down these Brewers Of Mass Destruction, and end tea production in Iran IMMEDIATELY. Naturally, we'll have to implement measures to stop home-grown brewers. So, a coalition parliamentary plan, is to install a CCTV camera in EVERY UK kitchen. Yes. Every UK kitchen. Faaaaaacking 'ell, mate, if you've nothing to hide, you've nothing to fear, eh, eh, innit mate, innit!??! So why object!?!? Disagree with this war, and you're unpatriotic. No question about it. You're Anti-British TRAITORS. In fact, given the state of war, treason laws are being reactivated, to prosecute, and hang all opponents of this new war.
So...uhm, yeah, pour your tea down the sink, and dispose of all teabags, and kettles.
So, you might ask......what is this "DANGEROUS DRUG"?
.....
.....
That's right: TEA.Tea is an evil drug, which has an evil substance in it, called caffeine, which is a stimulant; in other words, it can send you psychotic, as the Daily Mail wisely informs you, day in, day out.
This evil drug is brewed by terrorists, as their prime funding for not only Weapons Of Mass Destruction, but Weapons Of Mass Destruction, that can vanish at the users' will. Ha! Take that, smarmy UN weapons inspectors! George Bush told you lot, motherfuckers! That's why you should listen to him, you inept bastards!
Reports (That'll look convincing enough), have shown that the chief brewers of this evil drug, who are also high in the ranks of Al Qaeda, are: P.G. al-Tipsali, Abu Typhoojir and Mohammed Tetleyqir, and are situated in Iran. IRAN!!! Yes, you fucking milk coffee drinking, sandal wearing, yoghurt knitting, left-wing hippy liberals; EYE-fucking-RAN!!!!! It all fits in! Duuuur, any simpleton could now put the pieces together. Iran. Nuclear weapons project. (That those junkie UN officials keep denying) Funding via tea. All. Makes. Sense!
Not ONLY that, but according to a study, founded in a collaboration with the News Of The World, and the Taxpayers' Alliance, tea has other social effects on our once great country, now Broken Britain. Yes. Tea is the starting drug which leads to all other drugs. People start drinking tea, only to lead on to a path of other, BIGGER drugs, like cocaine and heroin. Tea is also brewed THREE times stronger than it was before, as well, being FAR more dangerous. Oh, yes. Not a problem for good drugs, like whiskey, as we ALL (Except feral youths), know to drink less whiskey, as it's stronger. But tea, no. Oh, no no no. Different kettle of fish, I say. Tea, when brewed stronger, is just infinitely and unconditionally worse.
Tea also leads to higher divorce rates; one in three tea drinkers have been divorced. Let's look back to thirty years ago, when Britain was a bit more greater: tea was also brewed three times weaker then, as we established. Only one in 10 tea drinkers thirty years ago, had been divorced. See the pattern!? The stronger the "brew" (As those bleeding northerners say), the higher the divorce rate! You couldn't make it up!
An alleged effect, also, is that tea keeps people awake longer, as per the stimulant effect. Meaning? Meaning, more feral youths are prone to staying awake longer, roaming around the streets later.....causing more terror and vandalism on the streets of our ONCE GREAT COUNTRY!
Yes, indeed; the effects that this DANGEROUS DRUG has on society is irrefutable. But let's look at the history of tea: how did this DANGEROUS DRUG get passed into British society?...
...
...Fuckin' immigrants. That's what. That's more than enough reason to make this drug a class A drug.
But back to the terror link....
Yes, these Brewers Of Mass Destruction, threatening jihad against the West, like all Mu, er, I mean, extremists, are brewing this DANGEROUS DRUG in Iran, before our very eyes. And Ahmadinejad is naturally in cahoots. (What the fuck did you expect!?)
The way, the only way, to rid ourselves of this DANGEROUS DRUG, and these Brewers Of Mass Destruction, is to invade Iran. Yes. Invade Iran. Hunt down these Brewers Of Mass Destruction, and end tea production in Iran IMMEDIATELY. Naturally, we'll have to implement measures to stop home-grown brewers. So, a coalition parliamentary plan, is to install a CCTV camera in EVERY UK kitchen. Yes. Every UK kitchen. Faaaaaacking 'ell, mate, if you've nothing to hide, you've nothing to fear, eh, eh, innit mate, innit!??! So why object!?!? Disagree with this war, and you're unpatriotic. No question about it. You're Anti-British TRAITORS. In fact, given the state of war, treason laws are being reactivated, to prosecute, and hang all opponents of this new war.
So...uhm, yeah, pour your tea down the sink, and dispose of all teabags, and kettles.
Tuesday 27 October 2009
Latest Wankathon On BBC Have Your Say
Visiting the dog pound for the day.......talking about the Royal Mail, oh lordy lord.
Before I share the fun and frolics, I'll state on the issue that I've seen a real decline in the Royal Mail since Gordon Brown came into power; this observation is purely from a recipient's point of view, mind, but I've certainly felt that deliveries have been far slower, until, ironically, the strikes have kicked back up. I'm VERY worried how New Labour have undercut the Royal Mail with their third-way, corporate, part-privatisation of what is easiest for the management bullshit, and the Unions most certainly have a right to complain about how they're being undercut, and how Royal Mail is being undermined.
Equally, I think this strike has been done at a God-awful time, and makes me believe (Rather, reinforces my opinion), that Union leaders of today are complete cretins. Surely it was obvious that they'd be aware that the public would be somewhat against them, given plenty of others have put a lot on the line during this recession?
But that's my opinion, and given how much of a fickle fuck I am, I could change that opinion. But I do have to look over to the railways in this country, also, and notice terrible familiarities between that and the Royal Mail.
Pah, who gives a flying shite about my opinion? I'm just some yoghurt-knitting, long haired, PC do-gooder. Here's some real intelektualz at the Have Your Say messageboard:
That's the spirit: SACK THA LO' OF 'EM! Now THAT is Royal!
Hmm...blackmail
blackmail
n noun the criminal offence of demanding money from someone in return for not revealing discreditable information.
Does C Carver know something we don't know? What could this unknown skeleton in the closet about the management fucks be, that the Unions are threatening to tell us? That they're corrupt and useless? Oh, wait, that's something we do know.
Gosh, I told you there'd be some stunning insight from Have Your Say on this issue! More! More!
"That's what I would have to do since I don't have a union." Awww, pass me the smallest fiddle in the world.
"I absolutely reject the idea that it is acceptable to hold the entire country at ransom." Look under: hyperbole
"Times are tough. Deal with it." Why don't YOU fucking deal with it? Don't you see the flashing irony? You sit there, telling others who are being undermined and shat on, and have been shat on for YEARS before the current recession to get on with it, and accept hardships, yet you're moaning about getting hardships yourself from the public sector.
"If you're not happy with your job, there's the door!
"No Sympathy. The workers are living in the dark ages – It is like the railways not progressing past the steam engine – Every business has to accept new technology most bills come through the internet – let them strike. Most other business / employees are living in the real world the threat of redundancies.
Hook, line, and sinker. What do I mean? Simple: for the entire course of this debacle, the management shithouses and Lord So-Many-Goddamn-Titles-It-Extracts-The-Piss Mandelson, have been throwing around, in retaliation, this corporate buzzword of "modernisation", which is really just a smokescreen, to add an entirely different issue (That of new technology replacing humans), into the mix, to obfuscate the issue. And it's worked. On HYS, mind.
"The CUW are a waste of space. When are they going to realise that unless they stop resisting change they are going to put themselves out of a job? And for them to say they dont want the public to be inconvienced by the strikes and then take legal action against the royal mail for hiring tempory staff to clear the backlog is a joke. I'm fed up of greedy public sector workers holding the public to ransom, if you dont like it, get a new job, start living in the real world.
Jon, Lincoln "
CUW? A new organisation involved? Jeez, what did I tell you? This HYS sure is a fountain of knowledge! (That's been pissed in)
"When are they going to realise that unless they stop resisting change they are going to put themselves out of a job?" That's not how Unions usually work, love.
"'I'm fed up of greedy public sector workers holding the public to ransom" Just where the fuck does this "ransom" thing come from? Where are people getting this from? How is it, in any way, shape, or form, a valid and logical term for describing the current situation?
"start living in the real world" The real world for HYSers, is the Zanu-Lab-PC-Gaaaaawn Maaaad-Innit-You-Couldn't-Make-It-Up-In-This-Once-Great-Country-Now-Invaded-By-Every-Tom-Dick-And-Abdul-Environmarxist-Stalinist-Nanny-State-Sold-Down-The-River-To-The-EUSSR-By-Jock-McBottler-Hellhole!!!!!1111111
Should I continue? Ah, fuck it; I'm going to listen to some Brothers Johnson. Have a good one, all.
Before I share the fun and frolics, I'll state on the issue that I've seen a real decline in the Royal Mail since Gordon Brown came into power; this observation is purely from a recipient's point of view, mind, but I've certainly felt that deliveries have been far slower, until, ironically, the strikes have kicked back up. I'm VERY worried how New Labour have undercut the Royal Mail with their third-way, corporate, part-privatisation of what is easiest for the management bullshit, and the Unions most certainly have a right to complain about how they're being undercut, and how Royal Mail is being undermined.
Equally, I think this strike has been done at a God-awful time, and makes me believe (Rather, reinforces my opinion), that Union leaders of today are complete cretins. Surely it was obvious that they'd be aware that the public would be somewhat against them, given plenty of others have put a lot on the line during this recession?
But that's my opinion, and given how much of a fickle fuck I am, I could change that opinion. But I do have to look over to the railways in this country, also, and notice terrible familiarities between that and the Royal Mail.
Pah, who gives a flying shite about my opinion? I'm just some yoghurt-knitting, long haired, PC do-gooder. Here's some real intelektualz at the Have Your Say messageboard:
"Sack the lot and employ workers who will appreciate having a job.Striking is just a form of blackmail, there is nothing Royal about that.
C Carver, Perth"That's the spirit: SACK THA LO' OF 'EM! Now THAT is Royal!
Hmm...blackmail
blackmail
n noun the criminal offence of demanding money from someone in return for not revealing discreditable information.
Does C Carver know something we don't know? What could this unknown skeleton in the closet about the management fucks be, that the Unions are threatening to tell us? That they're corrupt and useless? Oh, wait, that's something we do know.
Gosh, I told you there'd be some stunning insight from Have Your Say on this issue! More! More!
"I don't care about the plight of the postal workers. If you don't like your working conditions, find another job! That's what I would have to do since I don't have a union. I absolutely reject the idea that it is acceptable to hold the entire country at ransom. I don't expect the rest of the country give a toss about my problems. Why do people think there is a right to a job that never changes? Times are tough. Deal with it.
R Milner, Milton Keynes""That's what I would have to do since I don't have a union." Awww, pass me the smallest fiddle in the world.
"I absolutely reject the idea that it is acceptable to hold the entire country at ransom." Look under: hyperbole
"Times are tough. Deal with it." Why don't YOU fucking deal with it? Don't you see the flashing irony? You sit there, telling others who are being undermined and shat on, and have been shat on for YEARS before the current recession to get on with it, and accept hardships, yet you're moaning about getting hardships yourself from the public sector.
"If you're not happy with your job, there's the door!
Thats true for all jobs.
Change is a part of life and all work places.
Nothing stands still.
Andrew Lye, Johnston, Pembrokeshire, United Kingdom"
Just what we need; an E-Philosopher! However, it has little bearing or substance on the issue at hand. *yawn*"No Sympathy. The workers are living in the dark ages – It is like the railways not progressing past the steam engine – Every business has to accept new technology most bills come through the internet – let them strike. Most other business / employees are living in the real world the threat of redundancies.
Why doesn’t it apply to them ?
A.Smith, Burton-on-Trent "Hook, line, and sinker. What do I mean? Simple: for the entire course of this debacle, the management shithouses and Lord So-Many-Goddamn-Titles-It-Extracts-The-Piss Mandelson, have been throwing around, in retaliation, this corporate buzzword of "modernisation", which is really just a smokescreen, to add an entirely different issue (That of new technology replacing humans), into the mix, to obfuscate the issue. And it's worked. On HYS, mind.
"The CUW are a waste of space. When are they going to realise that unless they stop resisting change they are going to put themselves out of a job? And for them to say they dont want the public to be inconvienced by the strikes and then take legal action against the royal mail for hiring tempory staff to clear the backlog is a joke. I'm fed up of greedy public sector workers holding the public to ransom, if you dont like it, get a new job, start living in the real world.
Jon, Lincoln "
CUW? A new organisation involved? Jeez, what did I tell you? This HYS sure is a fountain of knowledge! (That's been pissed in)
"When are they going to realise that unless they stop resisting change they are going to put themselves out of a job?" That's not how Unions usually work, love.
"'I'm fed up of greedy public sector workers holding the public to ransom" Just where the fuck does this "ransom" thing come from? Where are people getting this from? How is it, in any way, shape, or form, a valid and logical term for describing the current situation?
"start living in the real world" The real world for HYSers, is the Zanu-Lab-PC-Gaaaaawn Maaaad-Innit-You-Couldn't-Make-It-Up-In-This-Once-Great-Country-Now-Invaded-By-Every-Tom-Dick-And-Abdul-Environmarxist-Stalinist-Nanny-State-Sold-Down-The-River-To-The-EUSSR-By-Jock-McBottler-Hellhole!!!!!1111111
Should I continue? Ah, fuck it; I'm going to listen to some Brothers Johnson. Have a good one, all.
Saturday 24 October 2009
Griffinitis
It's an awful virus. And I'm only observing it; I don't speak as the affected.
I sort of had this echo of a prediction in the back of my mind, just before the broadcasting of the Question Time episode with Griffin, that after all members of the panel would unanimously tried to stitch up Nick Griffin (And Slack Jaw/Jack Straw making a balls of it), Nick Griffin would play the victim card, and complain to the BBC about "unfair treatment". And as it happens, that echo came to be. Oh no!!!!!!! We've all played into Griffin's hands! Run for the hills!!!!!1111111
Perhaps the move was an admission of guilt, on Griffin's part, that he handled his performance piss poorly? Nobody thought of that, that it was an indicator that even Griffin was aware that his performance was shit. But no. Let the headless chickens run around, in the rotating insanity of the BNP hysteria, overplaying these already overplayed coalition of thugs. (I'm refraining from calling them a "party")
Then there's the YouGov poll, where 22% of people who participated the poll (For the fucking Telegraph, mind you), CONSIDERED voting for the BNP.
Considered? Run for the fucking hills! The idea crossed their mind, by Jesus! Hey, maybe we can have another poll, saying 80% of people CONSIDERED voting UKIP. That's fucking it! A four-gone conclusion that UKIP will WIN the next General Election! "Considering", has absolutely no bearing on whether they'll do it. You may "consider" something for five fucking minutes; it means Jack Shit on whether it'll actually amount to anything substantial.
Ugh.
I actually hate talking about the BNP, because they're so fucking boring. At least Adolf Hitler was charismatic. Nick Griffin is a sack of shit in a suit, who couldn't even remotely pulverise me to any of his causes. And the most laughable factor of all, is that he's the most intelligent member in the BNP. Who's likely to succeed Griffin in leadership? Mark "Hitler will live forever" Collett. A fucking nutter, who is about as eloquent as Father Jack Hackett. It's patently obvious that the BNP are a bunch of racist, Nazi hallions, lead by the worst of demagoguery and imps. They couldn't convince me, even if they had Jimi Hendrix spreading their filthy message. I can call bullshit when I fucking see it, and so can many of the British public. 66%, of people within that same YouGov poll, in fact, wouldn't vote for the BNP under any circumstances.
Oh, but still, people are considering voting for them, just like people would consider voting anyone who's on the ballot. Run for the hills!!!!!!!!!11111111111111 Outrage! Frenzy! Pandemonium!
I'm just not buying it. Sorry, but my mind provides the antigens for Griffinitis. I just don't buy into the hype, and I'd love it if I could continue without having to think about the BNP. To be honest, I don't particularly want to talk about them now, but I just wanted to break the silence, and break the habit of me wandering round rooms, imposing my pathological neatness onto them. So I sat down to write.
And whilst the mainstream newspapers bang on about the BNP, they'll still be trotting the 70 million UK population scare PREDICTIONS. Fuck me. Please tell me I'm not alone.
I sort of had this echo of a prediction in the back of my mind, just before the broadcasting of the Question Time episode with Griffin, that after all members of the panel would unanimously tried to stitch up Nick Griffin (And Slack Jaw/Jack Straw making a balls of it), Nick Griffin would play the victim card, and complain to the BBC about "unfair treatment". And as it happens, that echo came to be. Oh no!!!!!!! We've all played into Griffin's hands! Run for the hills!!!!!1111111
Perhaps the move was an admission of guilt, on Griffin's part, that he handled his performance piss poorly? Nobody thought of that, that it was an indicator that even Griffin was aware that his performance was shit. But no. Let the headless chickens run around, in the rotating insanity of the BNP hysteria, overplaying these already overplayed coalition of thugs. (I'm refraining from calling them a "party")
Then there's the YouGov poll, where 22% of people who participated the poll (For the fucking Telegraph, mind you), CONSIDERED voting for the BNP.
Considered? Run for the fucking hills! The idea crossed their mind, by Jesus! Hey, maybe we can have another poll, saying 80% of people CONSIDERED voting UKIP. That's fucking it! A four-gone conclusion that UKIP will WIN the next General Election! "Considering", has absolutely no bearing on whether they'll do it. You may "consider" something for five fucking minutes; it means Jack Shit on whether it'll actually amount to anything substantial.
Ugh.
I actually hate talking about the BNP, because they're so fucking boring. At least Adolf Hitler was charismatic. Nick Griffin is a sack of shit in a suit, who couldn't even remotely pulverise me to any of his causes. And the most laughable factor of all, is that he's the most intelligent member in the BNP. Who's likely to succeed Griffin in leadership? Mark "Hitler will live forever" Collett. A fucking nutter, who is about as eloquent as Father Jack Hackett. It's patently obvious that the BNP are a bunch of racist, Nazi hallions, lead by the worst of demagoguery and imps. They couldn't convince me, even if they had Jimi Hendrix spreading their filthy message. I can call bullshit when I fucking see it, and so can many of the British public. 66%, of people within that same YouGov poll, in fact, wouldn't vote for the BNP under any circumstances.
Oh, but still, people are considering voting for them, just like people would consider voting anyone who's on the ballot. Run for the hills!!!!!!!!!11111111111111 Outrage! Frenzy! Pandemonium!
I'm just not buying it. Sorry, but my mind provides the antigens for Griffinitis. I just don't buy into the hype, and I'd love it if I could continue without having to think about the BNP. To be honest, I don't particularly want to talk about them now, but I just wanted to break the silence, and break the habit of me wandering round rooms, imposing my pathological neatness onto them. So I sat down to write.
And whilst the mainstream newspapers bang on about the BNP, they'll still be trotting the 70 million UK population scare PREDICTIONS. Fuck me. Please tell me I'm not alone.
Monday 19 October 2009
How Political Correctness Has Ruined Our Society........
.....but not how we're usually told it has.
Initially, I asked various individuals what this term "Political Correctness" was, and what it meant. Naturally, I got a plethora of answers, varying from "social engineering created in the early 90s" (By whom?), to worryingly Nazi-like sounding arguments, about Political Correctness originating from Leninism.
But not one of these definitions gave to me had a shred of evidence behind it, nor did it actually amount to any meaningful definition, even if it was backed with evidence.
Because if it did, we'd know precisely what it was, and it wouldn't be "going mad and worse", as we're usually being told it is; if we knew what the ideology was based upon, we'd get the picture, but we're not given even the pigments.
And, yes, incidentally, when I pressed for an answer to what Political Correctness, as an ideology or doctrine is, I just got the response of "it's gone mad". Add a grating to the ear South London accent to that, and you'll get the exact response I received.
But then, you begin to realise that such attempts to find the actualities of it are futile. You'd be better and more accurate in crafting your own definition of it, which is what I have done: it's merely a newspaper buzzword to play on the paranoia of old, washed out traditionalists. And unlike the other crap definitions given to me, I DO have evidence to prove that one. One of the first modern relevant usages of the term was by Richard Bernstein in the New York Times, talking about the "Cultural Wars".
I used to laugh at the term, honestly. It was something of a spectacle, to see paranoid old white middle-class Daily Mail columnists deem the lack of hot-cross buns in hospitals as being something to do with it them being banned, under the guise of "Political Correctness".
But not anymore.
This made me change my mind.
A Question Time panel article on the BBC? What's so special about that?
Well...
When reading their short biography of Dambisa Moyo (Someone who I previously hadn't heard of), I came across this disturbing sentence:
"Here is an African woman, articulate, smart, glamorous, delivering a message of brazen political incorrectness: cut aid to Africa"
This sentence is just horrifying on so many levels. I'm not referring to the description of the controversial nature of Dambisa's views, or anything of the kind, but the mentioning of "political incorrectness". Since when the FUCK has debating whether STARVING people in the third world should be with financial aid or not, or whether it will be put to good use or not, had ANY-FUCKING-THING to do with Political Correctness? Controversial? Absolutely. Politically Incorrect? Who gives a motherfuck? Are we going to lose all our fucking sensibility and humanity in this drunken stupor of "hilarious", cutting edge wit of mocking or complaining about a perceived "Political Correctness"? Is THAT what we, as a society have came to, where the issue is not the simple ethical matters, like weighing up the factor of starving people in the third-world, but getting some brownie points over so-called "Political Correctness"? Absolutely disturbing
But this is what the fear of "Political Correctness" has manifested as: an agenda. An agenda which attracts. And makes money, too! Fuck the BBC for falling for this shit. Heavily.
But most importantly, fuck all the pathetic rags of newspapers which have perpetuated this new dolchstoss, as not only does it become a new agenda in itself, marketed like every other fucking thing under the sun, but it also becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; how many slimy councillors, after seeing some tabloid lie about local councils not doing such and such, on the basis of "Political Correctness", will mask their own fuckups and mis-management, by hiding behind the new reason of "Political Correctness", only for the lie to be then further spread by rag tabloids within the frenzied, rotating insanity of this "Political Correctness" anti-craze?
If we can disturbingly include the element of so-called "Political Correctness" into the issue of third-world starvation, then where do we end, to realise that this new, scaremongering agenda has become so warped that it trivialises the most horrific elements of the world? Had the term been about in the 1930s and 40s in the fashion that it is now, would the Holocaust have been trivialised in the same sense, with the Mailites of then, talking and whipping up fear over "Political Correctness" on the utter ugliness and horrors of the Holocaust at the time? It's a VERY scary concept. And it is able to trivialise any of the world's greatest catastrophes and injustices.
Initially, I asked various individuals what this term "Political Correctness" was, and what it meant. Naturally, I got a plethora of answers, varying from "social engineering created in the early 90s" (By whom?), to worryingly Nazi-like sounding arguments, about Political Correctness originating from Leninism.
But not one of these definitions gave to me had a shred of evidence behind it, nor did it actually amount to any meaningful definition, even if it was backed with evidence.
Because if it did, we'd know precisely what it was, and it wouldn't be "going mad and worse", as we're usually being told it is; if we knew what the ideology was based upon, we'd get the picture, but we're not given even the pigments.
And, yes, incidentally, when I pressed for an answer to what Political Correctness, as an ideology or doctrine is, I just got the response of "it's gone mad". Add a grating to the ear South London accent to that, and you'll get the exact response I received.
But then, you begin to realise that such attempts to find the actualities of it are futile. You'd be better and more accurate in crafting your own definition of it, which is what I have done: it's merely a newspaper buzzword to play on the paranoia of old, washed out traditionalists. And unlike the other crap definitions given to me, I DO have evidence to prove that one. One of the first modern relevant usages of the term was by Richard Bernstein in the New York Times, talking about the "Cultural Wars".
I used to laugh at the term, honestly. It was something of a spectacle, to see paranoid old white middle-class Daily Mail columnists deem the lack of hot-cross buns in hospitals as being something to do with it them being banned, under the guise of "Political Correctness".
But not anymore.
This made me change my mind.
A Question Time panel article on the BBC? What's so special about that?
Well...
When reading their short biography of Dambisa Moyo (Someone who I previously hadn't heard of), I came across this disturbing sentence:
"Here is an African woman, articulate, smart, glamorous, delivering a message of brazen political incorrectness: cut aid to Africa"
This sentence is just horrifying on so many levels. I'm not referring to the description of the controversial nature of Dambisa's views, or anything of the kind, but the mentioning of "political incorrectness". Since when the FUCK has debating whether STARVING people in the third world should be with financial aid or not, or whether it will be put to good use or not, had ANY-FUCKING-THING to do with Political Correctness? Controversial? Absolutely. Politically Incorrect? Who gives a motherfuck? Are we going to lose all our fucking sensibility and humanity in this drunken stupor of "hilarious", cutting edge wit of mocking or complaining about a perceived "Political Correctness"? Is THAT what we, as a society have came to, where the issue is not the simple ethical matters, like weighing up the factor of starving people in the third-world, but getting some brownie points over so-called "Political Correctness"? Absolutely disturbing
But this is what the fear of "Political Correctness" has manifested as: an agenda. An agenda which attracts. And makes money, too! Fuck the BBC for falling for this shit. Heavily.
But most importantly, fuck all the pathetic rags of newspapers which have perpetuated this new dolchstoss, as not only does it become a new agenda in itself, marketed like every other fucking thing under the sun, but it also becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy; how many slimy councillors, after seeing some tabloid lie about local councils not doing such and such, on the basis of "Political Correctness", will mask their own fuckups and mis-management, by hiding behind the new reason of "Political Correctness", only for the lie to be then further spread by rag tabloids within the frenzied, rotating insanity of this "Political Correctness" anti-craze?
If we can disturbingly include the element of so-called "Political Correctness" into the issue of third-world starvation, then where do we end, to realise that this new, scaremongering agenda has become so warped that it trivialises the most horrific elements of the world? Had the term been about in the 1930s and 40s in the fashion that it is now, would the Holocaust have been trivialised in the same sense, with the Mailites of then, talking and whipping up fear over "Political Correctness" on the utter ugliness and horrors of the Holocaust at the time? It's a VERY scary concept. And it is able to trivialise any of the world's greatest catastrophes and injustices.
Saturday 17 October 2009
This Is Great
Jan Moir getting hammered over her homophobic article today, who also thought cannabis could have been the source of some heart failure (Cannabis doesn't cause fluid on the lungs or is even lethal, for that matter......)
Stephen Fry and Derren Brown have also weighed in, critical of Jan Moir.
Superb stuff, folks; that's the spirit!
Stephen Fry and Derren Brown have also weighed in, critical of Jan Moir.
Superb stuff, folks; that's the spirit!
Sunday 11 October 2009
Multicultural Society?
I've been thinking; everyone always drone on, from "both sides" of this absurd argument, about living in a multicultural society, and the effects of it. "We live in a multicultural society, so you shouldn't say that!", one may say, or another may predictably say, "BRITISH VALUES HAVE BEEN ERODED BY MULTICULTURALISM!" (Whilst they're putting down their copy of the Daily Mail)
But do we really live in a multicultural society?
When you look at it, we don't, really, and the people who say we do, are only confusing annexation of elements of other cultures, in order to expand British culture, for "multiculturalism".
Chicken Tikka Masala, for example: people would think that's Indian, and a fine example of multiculturalism, but the reality of it is, is that this dish hardly exists, if at all, within India. This is a British customed dish, but its roots, of course, are undoubtedly traced back to the Indian subcontinent. One may further argue that because those roots made its way into Britain, it's a fine example of multiculturalism, but again, I must repeat that the actual dish is highly unlikely to be found in India itself.
To take the so-called "other side", yet argue and result in the same conclusion, let's take a look at Fish and Chips: emblem of British produce? Actually, no, not really. Depending on where you are (And this does apply to where I am in the UK), Fish and Chip shops were spread via Irish immigrants. So, again, this so-called emblem of British culture is not exactly rooted within insular British blood-lines, but, of course, it is part of British culture, because we, as a culture, annexed Fish and Chip shops into our culture.
What I'm saying, is that of course, I don't believe in the frothing bigots of the Littlejohn/Gaunt/Hitchens ilk, that British culture is based on some pathetic insularity, where we can conceivably (Ho ho) expand as a culture, holding the very popularised, "Britain Is Full!" sign. At the same time, to take the view that we are a multicultural society, isn't exactly intellectually honest.
Let's gawp at the perceived realities of the Mail and the Sun etc, and pretend that there's mass Muslim ghettos across the country, and huge community divide. Even if this were all true, there'd be British, and, perhaps even regional colloquialisms that everyone from these Muslim ghettos, and outside of them, would be familiar with, and use on a regular basis, which would most likely be completely unknown to Muslims in any other country in the world, or even just anyone else who has never lived in Britain. Jokes about "Asian corner shops", for instance; would you find such jokes in America? Of course not, unless it was from someone who has been in Britain. Even driving on the left side of the road, which happens to not be the case in most countries around the world. How we vote. How our laws are set out. Lots of aspects which point to a unique cultural binding, regardless of every Tom, Dick and Abdul (Har har) coming in.
To repeat the point, of course, Britain can drastically change its own culture, through a various number of ways, and can annex (And should) far more elements of other nation's cultures, but multicultural? Sorry, it's not quite true.
As you may have gathered, I like Jamaican roots reggae; does that mean Jamaican culture as a whole is present amongst Britain? Of course not. I also like African-American music, like soul, jazz and funk; again, testimony to African-American culture as a whole being present within Britain? Nope
So, uhm, yeah, we don't live in a multicultural society, regardless of what happens.
But do we really live in a multicultural society?
When you look at it, we don't, really, and the people who say we do, are only confusing annexation of elements of other cultures, in order to expand British culture, for "multiculturalism".
Chicken Tikka Masala, for example: people would think that's Indian, and a fine example of multiculturalism, but the reality of it is, is that this dish hardly exists, if at all, within India. This is a British customed dish, but its roots, of course, are undoubtedly traced back to the Indian subcontinent. One may further argue that because those roots made its way into Britain, it's a fine example of multiculturalism, but again, I must repeat that the actual dish is highly unlikely to be found in India itself.
To take the so-called "other side", yet argue and result in the same conclusion, let's take a look at Fish and Chips: emblem of British produce? Actually, no, not really. Depending on where you are (And this does apply to where I am in the UK), Fish and Chip shops were spread via Irish immigrants. So, again, this so-called emblem of British culture is not exactly rooted within insular British blood-lines, but, of course, it is part of British culture, because we, as a culture, annexed Fish and Chip shops into our culture.
What I'm saying, is that of course, I don't believe in the frothing bigots of the Littlejohn/Gaunt/Hitchens ilk, that British culture is based on some pathetic insularity, where we can conceivably (Ho ho) expand as a culture, holding the very popularised, "Britain Is Full!" sign. At the same time, to take the view that we are a multicultural society, isn't exactly intellectually honest.
Let's gawp at the perceived realities of the Mail and the Sun etc, and pretend that there's mass Muslim ghettos across the country, and huge community divide. Even if this were all true, there'd be British, and, perhaps even regional colloquialisms that everyone from these Muslim ghettos, and outside of them, would be familiar with, and use on a regular basis, which would most likely be completely unknown to Muslims in any other country in the world, or even just anyone else who has never lived in Britain. Jokes about "Asian corner shops", for instance; would you find such jokes in America? Of course not, unless it was from someone who has been in Britain. Even driving on the left side of the road, which happens to not be the case in most countries around the world. How we vote. How our laws are set out. Lots of aspects which point to a unique cultural binding, regardless of every Tom, Dick and Abdul (Har har) coming in.
To repeat the point, of course, Britain can drastically change its own culture, through a various number of ways, and can annex (And should) far more elements of other nation's cultures, but multicultural? Sorry, it's not quite true.
As you may have gathered, I like Jamaican roots reggae; does that mean Jamaican culture as a whole is present amongst Britain? Of course not. I also like African-American music, like soul, jazz and funk; again, testimony to African-American culture as a whole being present within Britain? Nope
So, uhm, yeah, we don't live in a multicultural society, regardless of what happens.
Wednesday 7 October 2009
We Are All In This Together!
Tony Blair, being the slimy bastard that he is, changed Labour to New Labour. Now me and Snooty Dave are doing the same, from Conservatives, to Modern Conservatives....we're all in this together!
And by jingo, to make matters worse, Inheritance Tax is costing a small fraction of people in this country; namely, me and Snooty Dave, which we can't allow to be taxed to death over what we, er, I mean, our relatives earned via hard work.....we're all in this together!
The Age Of Irresponsibility......Gordon Brown had not far from fuck all of a legacy...and neither will we....we're all in this together!
MPs' expenses are made yesterday's news because Labour and Conser, er, I mean MODERN Conservatives talked about clearing it up, nothing came of it, and it's in the back of most people's minds....we're all in this together!
Not having a legacy, as mentioned before, we couldn't really make up new policies, so we had to regurgitate old limp policies and promises us MODERN Conservatives made back in 2007....we're all in this together!
Here's our theme song for the election campaign of the MODERN Conservatives....we're all in this together!
Tuesday 6 October 2009
The Four Horsemen Of The Fuckupalypse: Talking Serious
*And whilst the top scientists and diplomats are discussing important issues like climate change, our favourite pseudo-intellectual quartet are discussing some highly important questions of the day*
Richard Dawkins: Now, ahem, gentlemen, I myself, as an avid lover of science and atheism, just in case you didn't know that of me already, ah heh heh, have came into this rather frequent, er, you know, retort, as it were, asking us if we, as atheists, could disprove the existence of God.
Christopher Hitchens: As I said in my up and coming book which can be previewed on Amazon and is available for purchase on November 16th 2009, entitled, "The Holy Spirit: Made A Hypocrite Out Of Me, So It Can Make A Hypocrite Out Of Anyone", *drinks whiskey*, which I will quote, if I may-
Daniel Dennett: No, you may not
Christopher Hitchens: Oh well who fucking cares about you? You're only here to replicate the physical appearance of our Lord Saviour, Charles Darwin. We may as well exhume the corpse of Charles Darwin, to get more value than you-
Richard Dawkins: Alright, alright, stop the bickering; whilst we're bickering, the worst thing could be happening, which is that yet another person could be converted to religion, which is the equivalent of 10 Little Boys going off at once, in terms of destruction. Now, Christopher...
Sam Harris: If I may-
Richard Dawkins: What the blast did I tell you before, young chap?! Keep it buttoned up unless you have something remotely interesting to say, which, even if you did, it still wouldn't be interesting, as it's being spoken by you. Now, if we may proceed; quote, by all means, Christopher...
Christopher Hitchens: Well, thank you Richard. It seems our friend Daniel here is fairly fond of theocratic madmen. But, if I may; in my up and coming, $15.99 book, available at November 16th 2009, "The Holy Spirit: Made A Hypocrite Out Of Me, So It Can Make A Hypocrite Out Of Anyone", I make it quite clear, that I have a particularly good eye for seeking out and spotting Spirits, especially if they're in my right hand, and let me tell you this, that if there is a Spirit branded as God, the last place you'd find it, is in that theocratic, raghead infested, blistering desert wasteland called, "The Middle East"; I've had many good conversations with my wise friend, Mr, George W. Bush on the subject of our shared secularist agendas, as well as the lack of Spirits in the Middle East, and now he really is a man who's fought long and hard against the invading ragheads from getting power, which is all too good in my book, or, rather, several books, also available on Amazon, for purchase, which you'll find by typing in my name in the Amazon search engine. Now, if I may, these influences can have wonderful effects, namely, my changing of my ridiculous beliefs in the past that ragheads were equal citizens, not to be bombed the fucking shit out of, to the beliefs that our wise leader of the free world, George Bush had, but a spirit that has divine power, and that is superior to me? You can..shove that right up your, anushole!
Richard Dawkins: This is a very interesting point that you raise, Christopher-
Christopher Hitchens: You expected less of me, than to make an excellent point?
Richard Dawkins: Oh no no no, dear boy, I never inferred such at all-
Christopher Hitchens: You'd be doing a blasted disservice to humanity if you ever did.
Richard Dawkins: *Sigh*, yes, yea-
Christopher Hitchens: By all means, have your freedom of speech thing, as I demonstrate with my constant shouting of "Fire!" in crowded buildings, a subject which I've also touched upon in my latest book, but let me tell you this now, and RIGHT NOW, I-
*Richard Dawkins punches Christopher Hitchens, knocking out Hitchens....not that he wasn't half unconscious before*
Richard Dawkins: Heavens that absolutely don't exist, Daniel, you were right; I shouldn't have let that buffoon quote from his book.
Daniel Dennett: I told you
Richard Dawkins: Yes, yes you did, old chap. Now, I-
Sam Harris: I-
Richard Dawkins: HUSH!
Daniel Dennett: Anyway, to answer your original question, Richard, if there was a Holy Spirit, capable of divine knowledge, A) It'd show itself, and B) Chrissy Hitchens down there unconscious on the floor, would have drank it by now, giving him the gift of divine knowledge..something he's very, VERY far from, at this rate!
Richard Dawkins: Chortle!
Christopher Hitchens: Uhhhhhh, aarrhhhhhh...*slobbers and groans in his sleep*
Daniel Dennett: Give him another punch to keep him quiet, Richard
Sam Harris: What I say, is tha-
Richard Dawkins: NO, NO NO!
Sam Harris: I'M SAYING IT ANYWAY! What I have to say, is that the objective nature of there being a God is below Lilliputian, which was proved by all naturalists and sceptics throughout the land, and
*Richard Dawkins and Daniel Dennett fall asleep at the complete ineptitude of Sam Harris to say anything which isn't coma-inducing*
Sam Harris:..what I have to say on the matter, is that objective, rational, scientific thought will be promoted by us all, to be.....oh, what's the use, the fuckers are asleep. I'm going to take a joyride on one of our Atheist buses.
Christopher Hitchens: Ugghh, uhhhhhh, eahhh, uh, FIRE!......FIRE!.....FI-zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz *continues to snore deafeningly loud*
*Sam Harris leaves the room*
Monday 5 October 2009
"Compassionate Conservatism" (Can't Polish A Turd)
John Major's "Back To Basics" campaign was all in vain!? Surely not!?
Aye, pretty much.
The Tories, paying homage to the Murdoch agenda moreso than ever, have *regurgitated* this disgraceful policy on incapacity benefits.
The only parts of the parcel we're getting from Conservative policy masters, is this, and the abolition of Inheritance Tax (Which, very strangely, would affect both David Cameron and George Osborne, of the few people who are affected by inheritance tax)
I think I could probably end this blog entry, with my point being perfectly clear to you, but I'll just make a few more small points.
He plans to use a private firm to calculate who *they* consider, from whatever testing (More bureaucracy!!!!!!!!1111) to be transferred to Jobseeker's Allowance, and not Incapacity Benefits. We know how "independent", independent commissions are in this country; what on Earth would make anyone believe a bleeding private investigative body would be even remotely objective on this? What sort of testing would this be? (As if incapacities can be accurately tested from a ridiculous scheme like this.......)
Now, I have a slight suspicion that a certain group within disability and incapacity will happen to be affected moreso than any other group, but I'll leave that one to echo in the depths of my mind.
What's interesting, is that they EXPECT 500, 000 to be affected, and how they can expect anything like that, I haven't the faintest idea. And would that, in actuality, be a target for this private investigative body to aspire to, in terms of finding people to transfer?
Unsurprisingly, on the point of offering training, I recall David Cameron in the Prime Minister's Questions actually attacking Brown on implementing this as a way to "massage the unemployment figures". Now he wants to offer training; heavens knows the real motivation!
Oh well, at least it isn't changing the actual definition of unemployment to massage the unemployment figures, on this one.
Aye, pretty much.
The Tories, paying homage to the Murdoch agenda moreso than ever, have *regurgitated* this disgraceful policy on incapacity benefits.
The only parts of the parcel we're getting from Conservative policy masters, is this, and the abolition of Inheritance Tax (Which, very strangely, would affect both David Cameron and George Osborne, of the few people who are affected by inheritance tax)
I think I could probably end this blog entry, with my point being perfectly clear to you, but I'll just make a few more small points.
He plans to use a private firm to calculate who *they* consider, from whatever testing (More bureaucracy!!!!!!!!1111) to be transferred to Jobseeker's Allowance, and not Incapacity Benefits. We know how "independent", independent commissions are in this country; what on Earth would make anyone believe a bleeding private investigative body would be even remotely objective on this? What sort of testing would this be? (As if incapacities can be accurately tested from a ridiculous scheme like this.......)
Now, I have a slight suspicion that a certain group within disability and incapacity will happen to be affected moreso than any other group, but I'll leave that one to echo in the depths of my mind.
What's interesting, is that they EXPECT 500, 000 to be affected, and how they can expect anything like that, I haven't the faintest idea. And would that, in actuality, be a target for this private investigative body to aspire to, in terms of finding people to transfer?
Unsurprisingly, on the point of offering training, I recall David Cameron in the Prime Minister's Questions actually attacking Brown on implementing this as a way to "massage the unemployment figures". Now he wants to offer training; heavens knows the real motivation!
Oh well, at least it isn't changing the actual definition of unemployment to massage the unemployment figures, on this one.
Saturday 3 October 2009
Hypocrisy From Top To Bottom Of The Column
I was mentally planning my next Four Horsemen parody, as a next post, but low and behold, the younger of the Hitchens Brothers (Gruesome Twosome), comes out with more inane shit.
http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2009/10/in-the-britain-that-is-to-come-do-not-be-old-weak-or-alone-youll-only-end-up-like-fiona-pilkington.html
Do not be old, weak or alone. Jesus, shouldn't we ought to be telling the Mail, this?
"In the Britain that is to come, do not be old, do not be weak, do not be vulnerable or different in any way, do not be alone."
Quite right; you'll only end up having hacks like Peter Hitchens spewing vitriol against you.
Like this shit:
"Why, the political elite sitting on its smug centre ground, which has for many years united round 'Care in the Community' - on the left because they swallowed absurd psychiatric rubbish about the 'rights' of the mentally ill, and on the right because they saw a chance to save money."
Do not be mentally ill in this country, or you'll have ignorant wankers like Hitchens lunging at you with his mental knife as sharp as a plank!
Yes, yes, this particular subject strikes home to me, because my medical records testify to me being mentally ill, as they do to many of my friends. We're not "menaces" to society, or any of that crap. (Certainly little chance for us to go out, just to "kill" someone, as Hitchens ignorantly assumed to be an activity for the mentally ill)
Neither was Fiona Pilkington, for that matter - "Fiona Pilkington had learning difficulties herself and was suffering from depression"
All this "rights" rubbish for mentally ill people! Fark me!
Oh, and of course, on difference, in which he mentions, we have to remind ourselves of this gem (turd)
"The evil that drove Fiona Pilkington to her horrible death was released by Labour and Tory governments alike, by the liberal elite in general, during half a century of misguided stupidity."
Liberal elite?
Hmm, that's funny; on the subject of Fiona Piklington, who was a victim of horrific bullying, and without doubt, a truly depressing story, was it not other fuckwits like the Daily Mail and Co, who were complaining about measures to prevent other forms of bullying?
Yes.
Yes, it was
I remember now.
Not surprised.
Just look at the comments on those articles, and their ratings, for testimony.
Anyway, back on track....fuck, you can get so distracted in all this hypocrisy!
Funnily enough, let me also highlight that this is the same Victorian society, that would have treated poor Fiona even WORSE. Nah, Hitchens really doesn't give a shit about that; bring back capital punishment! That's all he really gives a shit about.
"The elite continue to enjoy their liberty"
They certainly do, Hitchens. Keep enjoying that freedom to talk crap.
http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2009/10/in-the-britain-that-is-to-come-do-not-be-old-weak-or-alone-youll-only-end-up-like-fiona-pilkington.html
Do not be old, weak or alone. Jesus, shouldn't we ought to be telling the Mail, this?
"In the Britain that is to come, do not be old, do not be weak, do not be vulnerable or different in any way, do not be alone."
Quite right; you'll only end up having hacks like Peter Hitchens spewing vitriol against you.
Like this shit:
"Why, the political elite sitting on its smug centre ground, which has for many years united round 'Care in the Community' - on the left because they swallowed absurd psychiatric rubbish about the 'rights' of the mentally ill, and on the right because they saw a chance to save money."
Do not be mentally ill in this country, or you'll have ignorant wankers like Hitchens lunging at you with his mental knife as sharp as a plank!
Yes, yes, this particular subject strikes home to me, because my medical records testify to me being mentally ill, as they do to many of my friends. We're not "menaces" to society, or any of that crap. (Certainly little chance for us to go out, just to "kill" someone, as Hitchens ignorantly assumed to be an activity for the mentally ill)
Neither was Fiona Pilkington, for that matter - "Fiona Pilkington had learning difficulties herself and was suffering from depression"
All this "rights" rubbish for mentally ill people! Fark me!
Oh, and of course, on difference, in which he mentions, we have to remind ourselves of this gem (turd)
"The evil that drove Fiona Pilkington to her horrible death was released by Labour and Tory governments alike, by the liberal elite in general, during half a century of misguided stupidity."
Hmm, that's funny; on the subject of Fiona Piklington, who was a victim of horrific bullying, and without doubt, a truly depressing story, was it not other fuckwits like the Daily Mail and Co, who were complaining about measures to prevent other forms of bullying?
Yes.
Yes, it was
I remember now.
Not surprised.
Just look at the comments on those articles, and their ratings, for testimony.
Anyway, back on track....fuck, you can get so distracted in all this hypocrisy!
"Punishment, and the idea of evil, were discarded. Patience was a hindrance; sobriety, temperance and abstinence from drink or drugs were outmoded Victorian nuisances."
Ah, that's more like it; classic Hitchens wankspeak. That same Victorian society where pregnant women used what are now illegal drugs to relieve their pains? (Not that I'm against that) That same "patient" society, where you'd cane kids for being late to school classes, despite the reason being valid or not? And "abstinence from drink"...good God...we'll leave that one "hanging in the air", as they say.Funnily enough, let me also highlight that this is the same Victorian society, that would have treated poor Fiona even WORSE. Nah, Hitchens really doesn't give a shit about that; bring back capital punishment! That's all he really gives a shit about.
"The elite continue to enjoy their liberty"
They certainly do, Hitchens. Keep enjoying that freedom to talk crap.
Max Hastings Continues To Lack Self-Awareness
Here is Max Hastings' latest pile of shit on the Daily Mail.
Usual Mail bilge of "blah blah blah, BUREAUCRACY is overriden in this Stalinist, PC ridden country, ruining enterprise to sever the poor, and help the middle-class, PC gaaaawn maaad", but this one in particular caught my eye:
"Under Labour, national identity has been eroded, social cohesion weakened"
Max Hastings giving us a lecture on social cohesion!? Fuck me, taking public relations lessons from Gordon Brown would even be more favourable and insightful.
Surely Max Hastings has a reasonable concern for social cohesion...yes?
..." to the unprecedented ethnic and demographic turmoil which our politicians have unleashed upon us."
Sorry; clearly not, then....
But he is, in some way, making an effort to create social cohesion, what with, oh, you know, him having the power to write shite in national newspapers....yes?
Oh, that's a no, either.
Usual Mail bilge of "blah blah blah, BUREAUCRACY is overriden in this Stalinist, PC ridden country, ruining enterprise to sever the poor, and help the middle-class, PC gaaaawn maaad", but this one in particular caught my eye:
"Under Labour, national identity has been eroded, social cohesion weakened"
Max Hastings giving us a lecture on social cohesion!? Fuck me, taking public relations lessons from Gordon Brown would even be more favourable and insightful.
Surely Max Hastings has a reasonable concern for social cohesion...yes?
..." to the unprecedented ethnic and demographic turmoil which our politicians have unleashed upon us."
Sorry; clearly not, then....
But he is, in some way, making an effort to create social cohesion, what with, oh, you know, him having the power to write shite in national newspapers....yes?
Oh, that's a no, either.
Friday 2 October 2009
Want To Fend Off A "Foreign Invasion"? Start With Rupert Murdoch
I'm sure this all flies above the empty head of the average Sun reader and fanatic, but the real foreign invasion surely isn't from the ordinary immigrant, trying to "better themselves" (See! See! I'm using their lingo!), but from Rupert Murdoch, who is that devoid of morality, that he pushes and shoves into any country's political affairs that he pleases, has the politicians surrounding him like a moat, to be then begging and pleading for Murdoch's support. (See: whoring)
I don't like Barack Obama whatsoever, for various reasons, but one thing is for sure: he managed to overcome and defeat the Murdoch Empire, set against him, who discredited him from the very start, which is admirable in some respect.
I don't like what the Sun has done to New Labour at all; despite me hating New Labour from the very beginning (Ho ho, unlike the Sun), this was clearly planned way before Gordon Brown's speech at the Labour conference. Way before all of this, Cameron was getting closer and closer to Murdoch, meeting up with him, and...well, I imagine all the rest of it, as articulated extremely well in the book I've just bought, called "Flat Earth News".
Of course, I agree with the concept of a Free Press, but surely, with such a huge sphere of influence it has (Aka, the world), its new modus operandi is: Make news to make money. Ad infinitum.
Whilst I'm not hoping for a New Labour victory in the next election, I'm afraid to say that the Tories may win, with increased electorial support, thanks to Murdoch and The Scum.
"Foreign Invasion" indeed.
I don't like Barack Obama whatsoever, for various reasons, but one thing is for sure: he managed to overcome and defeat the Murdoch Empire, set against him, who discredited him from the very start, which is admirable in some respect.
I don't like what the Sun has done to New Labour at all; despite me hating New Labour from the very beginning (Ho ho, unlike the Sun), this was clearly planned way before Gordon Brown's speech at the Labour conference. Way before all of this, Cameron was getting closer and closer to Murdoch, meeting up with him, and...well, I imagine all the rest of it, as articulated extremely well in the book I've just bought, called "Flat Earth News".
Of course, I agree with the concept of a Free Press, but surely, with such a huge sphere of influence it has (Aka, the world), its new modus operandi is: Make news to make money. Ad infinitum.
Whilst I'm not hoping for a New Labour victory in the next election, I'm afraid to say that the Tories may win, with increased electorial support, thanks to Murdoch and The Scum.
"Foreign Invasion" indeed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
